Saturday, July 08, 2006

Sad for columnlist Mr. Brown because of .......

Sad for columnlist Mr. Brown because of a article, he got a letter from MICA, calling him a partisan player in politics. HAHA! What a joke! I realised today I din read his friday column so I checked his blog and realised that he has been suspended.

Here again we see another paper submitting to the gahman. Sad, sad day for citizen voice. Yes, I agree it is right to correct the mistakes that a newspaper put out, but are the points that Mr. Brown put out really mistakes? It is worth considering.

1) Singaporeans are fed up with progress???? True??? Is there evidence (whether survey or voting???) that show otherwise? Are we trying to say that singaporeans are really happy with the increase in prices???? I doubt so.

2) Progress Package is for the lower income family cope with the higher cost of life, how?? And paraphasing from what I read in "Rich Dad, Poor Dad" by Robert Kawasaki, most winners of lottery winners in United States ended poorer than the times before they won the lottery, due to poor management of sudden wealth. One reason why the lower income remains so is because they have no knowledge of acquiring and keeping wealth. As a teacher, I promise you that this is no taught in schools, even if there is a subject called "Principles of Accounts", which only teaches the pupils to balance the accounts.

3) By the way, how many families actually use to money to cope with the increase price of oil and not pamper themselves, children or ...... with gifts or whatever????? Any statistics available??? Personally my income tax is even higher than the progress package I receive. Why not just cancel my income tax and you can give my progress package to the lower-income??

4) Household income increases, the lower income (wages) shrink, true??? Why not?? Cost of world cup has a price tag on it, the last world cup free (Thanks to channel i, i believe). Price of coffee up, then same goes for the price of tea, milo........ Every economics students will tell you, price of goods go up, inflation takes place, the disposable income (lower income) shrinks, dun worry the progress package is expected to take care of the increase, but did not account that you have 10 mouths to feed. The other way of coping with the increase in price is to increase wages, which suits the upper income. Middle income how??? no big progress package, no wage increase, die lah!!!

5) "I am happy for progress, of course but I would be just as happy to make ends meet and to see my autistic first-born grow up able to talk and fend for herself in this society when I am gone. " quoted. I absolutely agrees. I guess I am quite a rational and logical person, maybe due to the subject I major in. What truely concerns us is not whether we have a card system that can be used to pay everything from top to bottom, we are concerned about our livelyhood. Example, when eazlink was inplemented, the trains and bus fares increased by 10 cents. Can you imagine during that time I had to travel from the top north of Singapore to NIE in the far west, my journey requires 2 bus trips and 1 mrt trip to go to NIE, meaning extra 30 cents to go and extra 30 cents to return home????? Meaning I spent extra 60 cents everyday to pay for the so-called new system. Why not they can keep their card system and let me save 60 cents everyday? And they say our fare is one of the cheapest in the world? People in England earn pounds and most have cars, so their fare maybe abit higher during the volume of travellers. And it is not fair to compare the value of the number. It maybe fairer to compare in ratio to the average income??? GNP or GDP?????

6) I will also like to child to be able to fend for himself when I am gone. Mr. Brown quoted the mean testing. Personally, as you may know that my son had wilm's tumour. I had to seek private treatment for my son. If you do not know, government hospitals charge the same amount as private hospitals for most treatments if you are a private paying patient. Most of the subsidies goes to the 'C' wards patients. Hence, as a private paying patient, $100 for an x-ray is the same whether you go to a private hospital or a government hospital. Even though medisave can be used, do you realised that medisave is actually taken from your pay?? So you still pay for your own medical bills. And deduction of medisave is limited. I ended up paying $10, 000 (50%) after medisave deduction. Thank God for family support, or else as a young family, where to find $10, 000 to pay for the medical bill. After the surgery, my boy still has to go for chemo (only $200 medisave deductible, when the bill is $400+) and flushing of his port-a-cathe after the chemo is over (which is non-medisave deductible, my money but i cannot use it)

7) If the government I voted in cannot take care of its citizens, then why should I continue to vote for the government ?????

It is regretable that Mr. Brown is suspended. Hope it is a short one so meanwhile can check out his blog. It is also regretable that the TODAY paper is now inline with the main papers, when it started out to be an alternative voice. other than encouraging constructive critic (I agrees to constructive critic), we also need constructive reply, instead of just slamming Mr. Brown, claiming that he distort the truth, which is very serious. Are you saying that Mr. Brown has intregity problem or he is a liar or which is all very serious accusation leading to slander, defamation????

5 Comments:

Blogger trisha said...

I think it is a sad day for Singapore and freedom and integrity when Mr Brown is muzzled in this way when all he did is echo the views of the average Singaporean.

Looks like they only want to hear things that tickle their ears. No negative feedback allowed.

8:25 PM  
Blogger km said...

He wrote something, the authorities thought otherwise and scolded him and now you imagine some sinster motive - mr brown has been silenced by the gahmen..death of free speech..

Is is wrong for the authorities to reply or for the papers to suspend him?

'alternative voice' - it doesn't mean the papers must publish everything or what is constructive to you or must always take an opposing stand against the gahmen

i don't see his article as constructive.. and i think many don't

everytime the gahmen takes issue with some bloggers or anyone, all the free speech gurus with repeat the same accusations - no freedom lah, no free lah..blah, blah, blah

do we allow everyone to speak without any reponsibilities

4:08 AM  
Blogger KiWeTO said...

To Nomluk,

there is nothing wrong for the authorities to reply if there are factual inaccuracies.

There is nothing wrong for the papers to suspend him if he has incited racism, or encouraged discrimination of any sort, or generally attempted to reduce the happiness in society.

Why is his review of the state of the average Singaporean unconstructive?

Is the Singaporean Mr Brown alludes to a friend we all know, and commiserate with, or is Mr Brown's allusion a Singaporean that only exists in Government economic models?

Is pointing out the state of life wrong?

To not tell the truth, is the first step towards denial of our existence.

E.o.M.

11:49 AM  
Blogger Gecko said...

nomluk: "do we allow everyone to speak without any reponsibilities?"

there is no divide between people speaking without any responsibilities in real life or on the blogsphere.

the same rules apply for such people - either they get rebutted or they get ignored.

there is a self-regulating mechanism on the internet whereby nonsensical or irresponsible writers are dismissed eventually.

6:31 PM  
Blogger two057 said...

Just thinking

Is he so wrong to point out that Singaporeans are not happy? Isn't Singapore ranked poorly in the Happiness survey? Are you happy here? do you not think of better jobs, better quality of life, less work more family time?

Mr Brown has only said what we wanted to say but did not and hid our true feelings. Be true to yourself.

5:55 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home